Re: PATCH: more fun with _arguments

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bart Schaefer wrote:

> On Sep 6, 10:23am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
> } Subject: PATCH: more fun with _arguments
> }
> } - add the utility function `funcall' to `compinit' which is a slightly 
> }   better version of the hook-calling function I suggested some time
> }   ago (should we use a different name?)
> 
> Yes, we should use a different name. I don't have a good one off the top
> of my head, but it should be something indicating it's related to the
> completion system; I think "funcall" is too generic.

;-) I used this name because I was thinking again about a generalised
package system. Then a `comp' prefix would be wrong.

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx