Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: BK & CVS (slightly off-topic)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 7731
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Zsh hackers list" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: BK & CVS (slightly off-topic)
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 22:30:09 +0000
- In-reply-to: <005c01befa35$40dba620$1e73e3a5@dell450>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <990907162927.ZM32134@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <199909080900.LAA08747@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <19990908114038.B20503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19990908154421.A18378@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <990908172610.ZM13625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <005c01befa35$40dba620$1e73e3a5@dell450>
On Sep 8, 1:03pm, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Subject: Re: BK & CVS (slightly off-topic)
> One thing we may wish to do is to hold off on a decision to use CVS for the
> public archive until the BitKeeper 1.0 release occurs
I had been meaning to mention BK myself, but I also have no direct experience
with it.
> It will be free to use for Open Source development.
Last I heard, it was to be free for any kind of development as long as you
are willing to publish your commit logs.
I'm not entirely thrilled with BK's license, but it seems it'd be OK for
zsh work.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author