Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: _mutt, _mailboxes

X-seq: zsh-workers 7867
From: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PATCH: _mutt, _mailboxes
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 16:38:23 +0100
In-reply-to: <199909161311.PAA01349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <199909161311.PAA01349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>

Sven Wischnowsky (wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> And while I'm at it... I'm the only one who writes option
> descriptions, it seems, which I can understand considering how tedious 
> that is. So my question is: if an option gets only one argument,
> should we turn it's description automatically into the
> option-description? Probably prefixed by something like `specify: '?

Sounds like a good idea.  How about a configuration key which in this
case would be something like `specify: %s'?

Adam

References:
- Re: PATCH: _mutt, _mailboxes
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author