Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: assoc array assignment problem.
- X-seq: zsh-workers 7972
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Tanaka Akira <akr@xxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: assoc array assignment problem.
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 04:59:34 +0000
- In-reply-to: <rsq7lllujs2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <rsq7lllujs2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sep 21, 10:37am, Tanaka Akira wrote:
} Subject: assoc array assignment problem.
}
} Z(2):akr@localhost% Src/zsh -f
} localhost% typeset -A arr
} localhost% a='$b'
} localhost% b='c'
} localhost% arr[$a]=d
} localhost% print -lr - ${(kv)arr}
} c
} d
} localhost%
}
} Hm. Variable expansion is performed twice.
This is not an associative array problem; it affects all arrays. Note:
zagzig<17> q=()
zagzig<18> g=7
zagzig<19> f='$g'
zagzig<20> q[$f]=seven
zagzig<21> print $#q $q
7 seven
zagzig<22>
The first substitution happens at the expected time, during evaluation
of the line. The second one happens at execute time in addvars() --
assignment is implemented as if `x=y somecommand` where somecommand is
null. addvars() calls setsparam(), which discovers that there is no
parameter named "q[$g]" and therefore creates "q" and then makes a call
to getvalue() to retrieve a Value structure for the parameter that it
just created. getvalue() then expands $g (as it would for ${q[$g]} in
which the stuff inside the ${ } has _not_ previously been expanded) and
you get the effect above.
And you can't even protect it with double-quoting, though using single
quotes counterintuitively (but expectedly, given the explaination above)
produces the desired result:
zagzig<26> arr['$a']=d
zagzig<27> print -lr - ${(kv)arr}
$x
d
zagzig<28>
I really have no idea when this got introduced. It might have something
to do with zsh-workers/4826 and follow-ons, back last year; 3.1.5-pws-4
would be it, but I no longer have anything that old around to try.
The right thing would be for the parser to know that it shouldn't expand
inside the [] on the left-hand side of an assignment, thereby delaying
the one interesting expansion to getvalue(); but that may be a bit too
much to bite off ...
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author