Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: "sh" job control

X-seq: zsh-workers 8111
From: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>
To: pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Stephenson)
Subject: Re: PATCH: "sh" job control
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 15:53:06 +0100 (BST)
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <9909301408.AA16679@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Peter Stephenson at "Sep 30, 1999 4: 8: 2 pm"
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

Peter Stephenson wrote:
>Clint Adams wrote:
>> The following patch introduces an option "shjobcontrol" (bad name?)
>> which skips the checkjobs() call.

I think CHECK_JOBS (with the opposite sense) would be a better name.

Btw, you put SH_JOB_CONTROL out of alphabetical sequence.

>It's probably because zsh doesn't set nohup by default. As it's set
>by default in sh mode, this seems a reasonable combination.

What does POSIX say about it?

-zefram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: "sh" job control
  - From: Clint Adams
- Re: PATCH: "sh" job control
  - From: Peter Stephenson

References:
- Re: PATCH: "sh" job control
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author