Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: Re: PATCH: emulate (Re: Prompt fun)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 8194
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: PATCH: emulate (Re: Prompt fun)
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 23:19:31 +0000
- In-reply-to: <991010230334.ZM5252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <E11ZAyr-0005J7-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <991010230334.ZM5252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Oct 10, 11:03pm, Bart Schaefer wrote:
} Subject: PATCH: Re: PATCH: emulate (Re: Prompt fun)
}
} I'm persuaded that the rest of the changes were OK.
I was just going through making these same changes in 3.0.6, when I was
brought to a sudden halt by `promptsubst'. It occurs to me that printing
the prompt can actually cause commands to be executed when `promptsubst'
is set, because of $(...) substitutions. Depending on what those commands
do, that certainly could affect the behavior of a script. I suppose it's
not a major issue, but I wanted to ask whether anyone else has an opinion
about it.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author