Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: About to release 3.0.7 ...

X-seq: zsh-workers 8325
From: Jos Backus <Jos.Backus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: About to release 3.0.7 ...
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 21:52:47 +0200
Cc: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <991018154827.ZM31763@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <E11d9qO-0001Vb-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <991018154827.ZM31763@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Jos Backus <Jos.Backus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 03:48:27PM +0000, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> It'd be more unixy to use "sockbufsize"; the common abbreviations are
> "sock" and "buf" as in setbuf() and setsockopt().  I don't think I've
> ever seen the abbreviation "skt" before.  Objections?

Good idea. I was about to make the same suggestion.

-- 
Jos Backus                          _/ _/_/_/  "Reliability means never
                                   _/ _/   _/   having to say you're sorry."
                                  _/ _/_/_/             -- D. J. Bernstein
                             _/  _/ _/    _/
Jos.Backus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  _/_/  _/_/_/      use Std::Disclaimer;

References:
- Re: About to release 3.0.7 ...
  - From: Zefram
- Re: About to release 3.0.7 ...
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author