PATCH: 3.1.6: Parsing optimization bug

["Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'd appreciate it if someone could tell me why parsing whatever follows
"foo()" is different depending on whether "function" appeared before it.
Nevertheless, it's certainly not right to throw away the parse entirely.

zagzig[54] foo() echo bar
zagzig[55] foo
zagzig[56] functions foo
foo () { }
zagzig[57] 

Index: Src/parse.c
===================================================================
@@ -1078,6 +1078,7 @@
 		sl->left = pl = (Pline) allocnode(N_PLINE);
 		pl->type = END;
 		pl->left = par_cmd();
+		c->u.list = l;
 	    }
 	    cmdpop();
 	    c->type = FUNCDEF;

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com