Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: FAQ acceptable to yodl 1.31

X-seq: zsh-workers 8465
From: Tanaka Akira <akr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PATCH: FAQ acceptable to yodl 1.31
Date: 28 Oct 1999 12:32:36 +0900
In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Wed, 27 Oct 1999 23:02:56 +0000"
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <19991027144015.A317@xxxxxxxx> <991027191213.ZM3829@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19991027153308.A2034@xxxxxxxx> <991027194003.ZM3872@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19991027155353.A2441@xxxxxxxx> <rsq4sfcldoy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <991027230256.ZM3969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In article <991027230256.ZM3969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
  "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Every one of those lines produces a "malformed patch" error.  What's
> happened to this in transit?

Hm. It is caused by the argument '-F^(' for cvs diff.

It is very useful for lisp programs, because the @@ ... @@ line has a
function/macro definition line and it makes easy to find the function
name of the hunk.

Anyway, it is no problem for applying the patch. Don't mind.
I deleted it from ~/.cvsrc just now.
# Recently, I don't develop lisp programs.
-- 
Tanaka Akira

References:
- FAQ and yodl
  - From: Clint Adams
- Re: FAQ and yodl
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- PATCH: FAQ acceptable to yodl 1.31
  - From: Clint Adams
- Re: PATCH: FAQ acceptable to yodl 1.31
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: PATCH: FAQ acceptable to yodl 1.31
  - From: Clint Adams
- Re: PATCH: FAQ acceptable to yodl 1.31
  - From: Tanaka Akira
- Re: PATCH: FAQ acceptable to yodl 1.31
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author