Re: PATCH: _whois

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bart Schaefer wrote:

> On Nov 9,  9:58am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
> } Subject: Re: PATCH: _whois
> }
> } (patch-readers will notice that there even is some
> } redundancy in this patch, trying to avoid getting this bug again
> } later).
> 
> I always experience some ambivalence about this sort of thing:
> 
> ...
> 
> So it would seem to me that there should at least be a DPUTS() in there,
> to mitigate the first couple of those effects.

I'm not really against this because, actually, I was thinking about
doing it myself. But then I decided that maybe it should be ok to call 
these two functions with a NULL pointer in the same way as it is ok to 
call functions like dupstring() with a NULL pointer.

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx