Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: 3.1.6-pws-9 available, I hope
- X-seq: zsh-workers 8711
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Zsh Hacker's List" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 3.1.6-pws-9 available, I hope
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:51:52 +0000
- In-reply-to: <rsqwvrbuqtk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <38388B85.6644A0DA@xxxxxxxxxxx> <rsqwvrbuqtk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Nov 22, 12:51pm, Tanaka Akira wrote:
} Subject: Re: 3.1.6-pws-9 available, I hope
}
} I imported pws-9 and compared to last revision patched from bart-8.
}
} This is summary of `cvs diff -r zsh-workers_8702 -r zsh-3_1_6-pws-9'.
A summary of differences from the version I have here:
* configure of -pws-9 has been built with a newer version of autoconf, so
I got a lot of essentially no-op diff lines on that.
* In addition to 8501, configure.in is missing this change, suggested by
Zefram but for which no patch was previously sent:
--- ./configure.in Sun Nov 21 04:36:00 1999
+++ ../../zsh-3.1.6/configure.in Sat Nov 6 22:39:21 1999
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@
AC_PROG_INSTALL dnl Check for BSD compatible `install'
AC_PROG_AWK dnl Check for mawk,gawk,nawk, then awk.
AC_PROG_LN dnl Check for working ln, for "make install"
-AC_CHECK_PROGS([YODL], [yodl], [exit 0; yodl])
+AC_CHECK_PROGS([YODL], [yodl], [: yodl])
dnl ------------------
dnl CHECK HEADER FILES
* Only a nit, but there's an extraneous space in one spot in math.c:
--- ./Src/math.c Sun Nov 21 15:00:36 1999
+++ ../../zsh-3.1.6/Src/math.c Sat Nov 20 12:47:13 1999
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@
#ifdef USE_LOCALE
setlocale(LC_NUMERIC, prev_locale);
#endif
- if (ptr == nptr || *nptr == '.' ) {
+ if (ptr == nptr || *nptr == '.') {
zerr("bad floating point constant", NULL, 0);
return EOI;
}
* I have the same doubled paragraph in compsys.yo that -pws-9 has. Based
on my commitlogs, it was included in both 8639 and 8633. (I can't check
this against the archive easily, as 8639 is uuencoded. Is there anyone
who really still cares about the roughly 25% savings in size gained by
doing gzip followed by uuencode?) Did you fix this by hand, Tanaka?
* Otherwise, my differences are the same as those Tanaka reported.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author