Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: bash-2.04 programmable completion

X-seq: zsh-workers 8820
From: Clint Adams <schizo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: bash-2.04 programmable completion
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 09:50:26 -0500
In-reply-to: <19991130124121.D26832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from adam@xxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 12:41:21PM +0000
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <199911300903.KAA19848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19991130124121.D26832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> <grin> But great programmers never re-invent the wheel.  What are the
> remaining valid reasons why people would prefer bash over zsh?  (I
> don't count inertia as valid :-)

It's compatible enough to impersonate a POSIX /bin/sh, for one thing.

References:
- Re: bash-2.04 programmable completion
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky
- Re: bash-2.04 programmable completion
  - From: Adam Spiers

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author