Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: Previous zsh.yo.in patch wasn't good enough

X-seq: zsh-workers 8881
From: Clint Adams <schizo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Previous zsh.yo.in patch wasn't good enough
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 10:36:25 -0500
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <991203151631.ZM18044@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 03:16:31PM +0000
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <E11tojT-0004ji-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <991203151631.ZM18044@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> If you're asking whether we should get rid of zsh.yo.in again so that
> zsh.yo is not a generated file, you'll have to ask Clint.  I'm just
> cleaning up after his patches in 8827 and 8841.

It struck me as cleaner/safer to do the substitution in the
.yo rather than the .texi, or worse, the .infos, but I don't
think I'd object as long as the end result is the same.

References:
- Re: PATCH: Previous zsh.yo.in patch wasn't good enough
  - From: Zefram
- Re: PATCH: Previous zsh.yo.in patch wasn't good enough
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author