Re: Style mechanism discussion

[Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Peter Stephenson wrote:

> Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
> > Another question is whether we should at least try to group the styles 
> > in some sensible way. Probably even using subsections. Opinions?
> 
> As long as they've got obvious names, I don't think it matters.  Calling
> things e.g. section.foo and section.bar is only better than foo and bar if
> section is really adding to the information, and even in that case it's
> probably easier just to change the name to section_foo and section_bar ---
> I don't think use of different namespaces is really necessary here.  Unless
> I've missed the point of this.

I think Sven is talking entirely about organizing the documentation into
sections, not renaming the styles themselves.