Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: chown and chgrp in files module
- X-seq: zsh-workers 8995
- From: James Antill <james@xxxxxxx>
- To: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: PATCH: chown and chgrp in files module
- Date: 09 Dec 1999 18:40:43 -0500
- Cc: jimkirk@xxxxxxxx (James Kirkpatrick), zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Zefram's message of "Thu, 9 Dec 1999 17:41:23 +0000 (GMT)"
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <E11w7ZD-0005l7-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: <james@xxxxxxx>
- Sender: James Antill <nevyn@xxxxxxx>
Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> James Kirkpatrick wrote:
>
> >This does not seem to be the sort of thing that should be built in to a
> >shell, any more than rm, ls, find, or a C compiler :-)
>
> It's very useful to have these things built into a statically-linked
> system administration shell. (That's where the request for a builtin
> chown originated.) In addition to the utilities I listed above, we have
> a `stat' module that effectively makes possible a full implementation
> of ls as a shell function, and zsh globbing with glob qualifiers very
> nearly makes find redundant.
Which begs the question, who's working on the C compiler ?:)
ObZsh: Would it be possible to have a statically linked sys-admin
shell built as part of the build process. Then you could literally
just have it[1] on a floppy and boot Linux with init=/bin/zsh_admin.
[1] Ignoreing the kernel and a _very_ small root fs (ok I guess you
probably want vi and fsck too ... but not much more).
--
James Antill -- james@xxxxxxx
I am always an optimist, but frankly there is no hope.
-Hosni Mubarek
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author