Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Development versions
- X-seq: zsh-workers 9066
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Development versions
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:43:04 -0500
- Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <E11wXhF-000624-00.1999-12-10-21-35-25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 09:36:13PM +0000
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <E11wXhF-000624-00.1999-12-10-21-35-25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> even more people would use them if they found them on the official mirrors
> --- maybe this isn't a problem. I could (as Richard used to do) make the
> directory unbrowsable, so you could only retrieve the file if it was there,
> but this would mean everyone getting the file from Australia, although
> that's not much of a difficulty nowadays. Maybe other people have strong
Whichever way is fine, as long as I can get it; wget not working is
a minor annoyance, but lynx will still get the file.
But seeing how often people are referred to a "pws" interim release
on the grounds that it is less buggy and more featureful than 3.1.6
makes me wonder if the "point" releases are too infrequent. It is
the unstable/development tree, after all.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author