Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: dl.h/dlfnc.h clash in module.c RE: 3.1.6-dev-15
- X-seq: zsh-workers 9320
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Zsh hackers list" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: dl.h/dlfnc.h clash in module.c RE: 3.1.6-dev-15
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 19:09:52 +0000
- Cc: Gene Cohler <gene@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: ""Andrej Borsenkow""'s message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2000 22:02:20 +0300." <000001bf5df8$b7dab6e0$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
"Andrej Borsenkow" wrote:
> O.K., looks, like my mail was lost.
>
> I complained about inability to load complete.so (that depends on zle.so) in
> dev-14. It turned out to be patch from 9200, that changed
>
> #ifdef HAVE_DLFNC_H
> #include <dlfnc.h>
>
> into
>
> #ifdef HAVE_DLFNC_H
> #ifdef HAVE_DL_H
> #include <dl.h>
> #else
> #include <dlfnc.h>
> #endif
>
> Our system has dl.h that has nothing to do with dynamic locading (it is most
> probably from Double Linked lists). It results in RTLD_GLOBAL being undefined
> (defined to dummy value in module.c) - with obvious consequencies ...
>
> The wording in 9200 was "HPUX 11.0 does not have dlfnc.h ..." - I fail to see
> how above patch fixes that.
The patch came from Gene Cohler <gene@xxxxxxxx> in 9211, and he'll have to
answer this, since most of us don't have access to HPUX 11. I think the
point is it needs to prefer dl.h to dlfcn.h in that case, if both exist.
(Although I agree that if the problem *really* is that dlfnc.h *doesn't*
exist, HAVE_DLFNC_H oughtn't to be defined in the first place and something
screwy is happening.) The solution may be to test something HP-specific.
Would changing the second line to
#if defined(HAVE_DL_H) && defined(__hpux)
suit everybody?
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author