Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: completion after ../
- X-seq: zsh-workers 9380
- From: Tanaka Akira <akr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: completion after ../
- Date: 20 Jan 2000 13:34:32 +0900
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <200001191618.RAA15845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <rsqwvp5ucjx.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In article <rsqwvp5ucjx.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tanaka Akira <akr@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hm. In general, I don't want to complete a directory which is already
> described in the word, with first <TAB> at least. Most frequently
> happened example is X/../Z where X/../Z is X.
I rethought the problem and I found another idea to describe it: A
directory which shouldn't complete with first <TAB> is the directory
which go back path. Of course, this is subset of previous idea but
it's enough for me. The directory X/Y/Z is a such directory iff [[ X
-ef X/Y/Z ]] where Y and Z contains no `/'. Note that if there is no
symlinks and in completion context, this happens only when Y == `..'.
--
Tanaka Akira
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author