Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: match again
- X-seq: zsh-workers 9471
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: match again
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 01:27:44 +0000
- In-reply-to: <mvb1z72w3bq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <200001281005.LAA20292@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mvb1z72w3bq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jan 28, 5:47pm, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
} Subject: Re: match again
}
} -compstyle '*:options' prefix-hidden yes"
} +zstyle '*:options' prefix-hidden yes"
(And several similar examples in comments.)
These are not equivalent. Is it really correct to change it this way?
The actual equivalent of the "compstyle" statement would be
zstyle ':completion*:options' prefix-hidden yes
While I'm on the topic, should there be a ':' before the '*' in that
example? One of the defaults installed by compinit itself comes out
like
zstyle ':completion*:default' list-colors ...
whereas all the others resemble one of
zstyle :completion:correct: prompt 'correct to:'
or
zstyle ':completion:*' verbose yes
which makes me wonder if it should be
zstyle ':completion:*:default' list-colors ...
Clue me on the subtlety, please.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author