Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Zsh 3.1.6 - ${~foo} expansion bug
- X-seq: zsh-workers 9611
- From: Thomas Köhler <jean-luc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Zsh 3.1.6 - ${~foo} expansion bug
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 00:25:10 +0100
- In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.4.10.10002072343280.17515-100000@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from jplauril@xxxxxxxxx on Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 11:30:04PM +0100
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0002071338360.674-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.OSF.4.10.10002072343280.17515-100000@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 11:30:04PM +0100,
Jukka Laurila <jplauril@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Jukka Laurila wrote:
> >
> > > These results were obtained with zsh 3.1.6 from the Debian Potato
> > > distribution.
> >
> > I can't reproduce this in 3.1.6-pws-1, built myself on RedHat 6.0, nor in
> > 3.1.6-dev-16 from the Mandrake RPM. What is your $ZSH_VERSION ?
>
> $ZSH_VERSION is 3.1.6-dev-16, and 'dpkg -l zsh' says my zsh is:
> ii zsh 3.1.6.pws16-1 A shell with lots of features.
>
> I just tried compiling zsh-3.1.6-dev-17 both with gcc 2.95.2 in my
> Debian Potato environment and with egcs-2.91.66 in my RedHat 6.1
> environment (using chroot). The one compiled in Potato was broken but the
> one compiled in RH 6.1 worked!
What do you mean by "broken"?
> Could someone try compiling zsh with gcc 2.95.2 and tell me if it
> breaks?
It compiled without problems, but it didn't find some modules (for
example zle) while running. Not having tried "make install", I don't
know whether this is an issue or not for a full install
CU,
Thomas [running Debian woody with gcc 2.95.2]
--
Thomas Köhler Email: jean-luc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | LCARS - Linux
<>< WWW: http://jeanluc-picard.de | for Computers
IRC: jeanluc | on All Real
PGP public key available from Homepage! | Starships
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author