Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Still bugs completing .files; _multi_parts



Peter Stephenson wrote:

> Firstly, I did
> 
> % less ~/.<TAB>
> 
> and got a list of files not beginning with a dot amongst those which did.

I don't get that. Let me guess: somehow you ended up with your
'r:|[.,_-]=* r:|=*' match spec being tried immediatly or used always
(as would happen with your setup from 9700, because the matcher style
is tested for every tag).

> Secondly and unrelatedly, I was trying out _multi_parts for the user guide
> and did (you can see where this is coming from):
> 
> _foo () {
>   local groups
>   groups=(news.announce.newuser
>           news.groups.questions
>           gnu.emacs.gnus
>           comp.unix.shell
>           rec.arts.sf.written
>           freeserve.test) 
>   _multi_parts . groups
> }
> compdef _foo foo
> 
> Hitting ^D, everything was fine: I get the list
>   comp.        freeserve.   gnu.         news.        rec.       
> as expected.  Now hitting tab, which causes menu completion and menu
> selection to start up, things start to go wrong.  First, the list is
> expanded to show both `news.', instead of pruning the duplicate.  Second,
> the value inserted is the full whack, e.g. `comp.unix.shell'; I can't
> simply cycle through the top level and select the next one down.  I'm
> puzzled about this because as far as I can see the only existing call to
> _multi_parts in _tar works just the same way, except with / as the
> separator.  The clue seems to be that if I go straight into completion
> without doing ^D things work as expected (except that I don't see a final
> `.' if the part isn't the final one, as I would expect to do in the tar
> case).

Second guess: _oldlist. The ^D makes _multi_parts call compadd in
non-menu mode and then _oldlist makes the same list be used again (in
non-menu mode _multi_parts, like _path_files, adds the whole possible
matches to get at the longest unambiguous string). And menu-selection
shows both `news' because for it these *are* different matches and it
has to give access to them.

Ok. The patch hopefully fixes this by making menu-mode compadd's be
used for ^D. It also changes the way the matches are added then to be
able to show the separators in menu-completion.

But maybe we should make _multi_parts use the `expand=suffix'
style/value to decide if the whole matches should be used at all. The
same way _path_files does that. I would prefer to make it use an empty 
tag then (because _multi_parts doesn't always complete paths and the
style is tested for the paths tag in _path_files). Because of that I
thought, I should ask first. Or maybe making it use the paths tag in
_path_files and no tag in _multi_parts is ok? (I find that a bit
confusing).

And while playing with it I decided I don't like that a simple
`g<TAB>' doesn't give me the whole `gnu.emacs.gnus', so I added the -i 
option (to _multi_parts). If that is given a single match is inserted
completely instead of just the next component. In other words: if you
want pathname-like completion: don't use it, but for simple strings as 
in this example, it is probably better.

Bye
 Sven

diff -ru ../z.old/Completion/Core/_multi_parts Completion/Core/_multi_parts
--- ../z.old/Completion/Core/_multi_parts	Wed Feb 16 12:40:33 2000
+++ Completion/Core/_multi_parts	Wed Feb 16 17:09:51 2000
@@ -8,14 +8,14 @@
 # separator character are then completed independently.
 
 local sep matches pref npref i tmp1 group expl menu pre suf opre osuf cpre
-local opts sopts match
+local opts sopts match imm
 typeset -U tmp2
 
 # Get the options.
 
 zparseopts -D -a sopts \
     'J:=group' 'V:=group' 'X:=expl' 'P:=opts' 'F:=opts' \
-    S: r: R: q 1 2 n 'M+:=match'
+    S: r: R: q 1 2 n 'M+:=match' 'i=imm'
 
 sopts=( "$sopts[@]" "$opts[@]" )
 if (( $#match )); then
@@ -93,7 +93,6 @@
       compadd -O tmp1 - "${(@)matches%%${sep}*}"
 
     tmp2=( "$tmp1[@]" )
-    tmp1=( "$tmp2[@]" )
 
     if [[ $#tmp1 -eq 1 ]]; then
 
@@ -106,17 +105,23 @@
         npref="${tmp1[1]}${sep}"
       else
         matches=( "${(@M)matches:#${tmp1[1]}*}" )
-	tmp2=( "${(@M)matches:#${tmp1[1]}${sep}*}" )
 
 	PREFIX="${cpre}${pre}"
 	SUFFIX="$suf"
 
-	if (( $#tmp2 )); then
-	  compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" -p "$pref" -qS "$sep" "$opts[@]" \
-                  -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "$tmp1[1]"
+	if [[ $#imm -ne 0 && $#matches -eq 1 ]]; then
+	  compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" "$opts[@]" \
+                  -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "$pref$matches[1]"
         else
-	  compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" -p "$pref" "$sopts[@]" \
-                  -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "$tmp1[1]"
+	  tmp2=( "${(@M)matches:#${tmp1[1]}${sep}*}" )
+
+	  if (( $#tmp2 )); then
+	    compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" -p "$pref" -qS "$sep" "$opts[@]" \
+                    -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "$tmp1[1]"
+          else
+	    compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" -p "$pref" "$sopts[@]" \
+                    -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "$tmp1[1]"
+          fi
         fi
 	return 0
       fi
@@ -137,20 +142,44 @@
 	SUFFIX="$suf"
       fi
 
-      if [[ -n "$menu" ]]; then
-        # With menucompletion we just add matches for the matching
-        # components with the prefix we collected and the rest from the
-        # line as a suffix.
+      if [[ -n "$menu" || -z "$compstate[insert]" ]]; then
+
+        # With menucompletion we add only the ambiguous component with
+        # the prefix collected and a spearator for the matches that
+        # have more components.
 
         tmp2="$pre$suf"
         if [[ "$tmp2" = *${sep}* ]]; then
-          compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" "$sopts[@]" \
-                  -p "$pref" -s "${sep}${tmp2#*${sep}}" \
-                  -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "$tmp1[@]"
+          tmp2=(-s "${sep}${tmp2#*${sep}}")
         else
-          compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" -p "$pref" "$sopts[@]" \
-                  -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "$tmp1[@]"
+	  tmp2=()
         fi
+        for i in "${(@M)matches:#(${(j:|:)~tmp1})*}"; do
+	  if [[ "$i" = *${sep}* ]]; then
+            compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" -S '' "$opts[@]" \
+	            -p "$pref" \
+                    -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "${i%%${sep}*}${sep}"
+          else
+            compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" -S '' "$opts[@]" -p "$pref" \
+                    -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "$i"
+          fi
+        done
+
+# The old code and its comment:
+
+        # With menucompletion we just add matches for the matching
+        # components with the prefix we collected and the rest from the
+        # line as a suffix.
+
+#        tmp2="$pre$suf"
+#        if [[ "$tmp2" = *${sep}* ]]; then
+#          compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" "$sopts[@]" \
+#                  -p "$pref" -s "${sep}${tmp2#*${sep}}" \
+#                  -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "$tmp1[@]"
+#        else
+#          compadd "$group[@]" "$expl[@]" -p "$pref" "$sopts[@]" \
+#                  -M "r:|${sep}=* r:|=* $match" - "$tmp1[@]"
+#        fi
       else
         # With normal completion we add all matches one-by-one with
 	# the unmatched part as a suffix. This will insert the longest
diff -ru ../z.old/Completion/Core/_path_files Completion/Core/_path_files
--- ../z.old/Completion/Core/_path_files	Wed Feb 16 12:40:34 2000
+++ Completion/Core/_path_files	Wed Feb 16 16:56:44 2000
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@
       tmp2="$testpath"
       compquote tmp1 tmp2
 
-      if [[ -n $menu ]] ||
+      if [[ -n $menu || -z "$compstate[insert]" ]] ||
          ! zstyle -t ":completion:${curcontext}:paths" expand suffix; then
         (( tmp4 )) && zstyle -t ":completion:${curcontext}:paths" cursor &&
             compstate[to_end]=''
diff -ru ../z.old/Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo
--- ../z.old/Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo	Wed Feb 16 12:40:15 2000
+++ Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo	Wed Feb 16 17:13:42 2000
@@ -2082,6 +2082,13 @@
 names in the way normal filenames are completed by the
 tt(_path_files) function.
 
+If given the tt(-i) option a single match left will be accepted
+immediatly even if that means that additional parts for which no
+separators were on the line are to be inserted. When completing from a 
+fixed set of possible completions which are really words, this is
+often the expected behaviour. But if tt(_multi_parts) should behave
+like completing pathnames, the tt(-i) option should not be used.
+
 Like other utility functions, this function accepts the `tt(-V)',
 `tt(-J)', `tt(-1)', `tt(-2)', `tt(-n)', `tt(-X)', `tt(-M)', `tt(-P)',
 `tt(-S)', `tt(-r)', `tt(-R)', and `tt(-q)' options and passes them to

--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author