Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Questions/comments on completion code that arise from PWS's zsh guide

X-seq: zsh-workers 9899
From: Tanaka Akira <akr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Questions/comments on completion code that arise from PWS's zsh guide
Date: 28 Feb 2000 19:16:08 +0900
In-reply-to: Sven Wischnowsky's message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:36:43 +0100 (MET)"
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <200002280936.KAA02281@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In article <200002280936.KAA02281@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
  Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Maybe we should change _telnet, it's really broken for me because it
> doesn't even guess that my telnet supports -l. I think we should
> change the default specs to _arguments. Or are there any telnets
> without a -l option? Tanaka?

Most poor telnet I know is on SunOS 4.

Z:akr@sulfer% telnet -h
-h: unknown host
telnet> 

It supports no options.
-- 
Tanaka Akira

References:
- Re: Questions/comments on completion code that arise from PWS's zsh guide
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author