Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

RE: ${_comps[(K)diff]}

X-seq: zsh-workers 10046
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Sven Wischnowsky" <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: ${_comps[(K)*diff*]}
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 13:04:29 +0300
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200003100954.KAA03102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

> > 
> > What you miss is that [(k)...] and [(K)...] don't do pattern-matching
> > on the keys.  I have an idea what's going wrong, but I don't have time
> > to fix it right now.
> 
> (I don't see anything wrong here, what am I missing?)
> 

k
     If used in a subscript on a parameter that is not an associative
     array, this behaves like `r', but if used on an association, it
     makes the keys be interpreted as patterns and returns the first
     value whose key matches the EXP.

K
     On an associtation this is like `k' but returns all values whose
     keys match the EXP. On other types of parameters this has the same
     effect as `R'.

-andrej

References:
- Re: ${_comps[(K)*diff*]}
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

RE: ${_comps[(K)*diff*]}

RE: ${_comps[(K)diff]}