Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: ignored-patterns giving correction a go
- X-seq: zsh-workers 10188
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ignored-patterns giving correction a go
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 17:10:14 +0100 (MET)
- In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:01:52 +0000
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Mar 21, 11:00am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
> } Subject: Re: ignored-patterns giving correction a go
> }
> } Bart Schaefer wrote:
> }
> } > } zstyle ... tag-order foo=files bar=files
> } > } zstyle '...:foo' file-patterns '*.ps'
> } >
> } > Presumably the '...' part in both of those lines is, in many cases,
> } > going to be the same. And then you need to repeat it _again_ to give
> } > the patterns for `bar'.
> }
> } Just occured to me: people don't need to repeat the patterns, of
> } course, as long as they use their own little naming convention for the
> } tags they invent:
> }
> } zstyle ... tag-order --foo=files --bar=files
> } zstyle '*-foo' ignored-patterns '*.ps'
>
> But people arent' going to invent their own tags all that often, are they?
> Tags right now are pretty much predetermined by the completion functions
> that use them, e.g. the way _files uses globbed-files. Hmm ... is that
> changed by what you're working on now?
Yes, and that's what the original example above was about -- the
`user' `invented' the tag names `foo' and `bar', linking them to the
`method' `files'. And before that I made the suggestion to allow the
file-patterns style to contain invented tag names.
> } > I find myself wishing for some way to merge
> } > them, maybe something like
> } >
> } > zstyle ... tag-order foo=files bar=files \
> } > + foo file-patterns '*.ps' \
> } > + bar file-patterns '*.pdf'
> } >
> } > That specific example would make the word `+' magic, which might not be
> } > a good idea ... but we're running out of metacharacters that don't need
> } > to be annoyingly quoted.
>
> Speaking of "just occured to me":
>
> function zstyle() {
I had played with the idea to first try it with a function, too ;-)
> ...
> shift "i > $# ? $# : i" # Stupid shift error on i > $#
Yes! It's annoying, isn't it? I was tempted more than one to change
it. Or maybe add an option to make it be quiet... unfortunately `shift -q'
has always been interpreted as `shift -$q'. Sigh.
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author