Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: ignored-patterns giving correction a go
- X-seq: zsh-workers 10196
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ignored-patterns giving correction a go
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:32:28 +0100 (MET)
- In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:46:09 +0000
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Mar 21, 5:10pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
> } Subject: Re: ignored-patterns giving correction a go
> }
> } > } zstyle ... tag-order --foo=files --bar=files
> } > } zstyle '*-foo' ignored-patterns '*.ps'
> } >
> } > Tags right now are pretty much predetermined by the completion functions
> } > that use them, e.g. the way _files uses globbed-files. Hmm ... is that
> } > changed by what you're working on now?
> }
> } Yes, and that's what the original example above was about -- the
> } `user' `invented' the tag names `foo' and `bar', linking them to the
> } `method' `files'. And before that I made the suggestion to allow the
> } file-patterns style to contain invented tag names.
>
> So where do the method names come from? I don't think we want this to
> be so configurable that, for example, the file-patterns style could be
> caused to generate parameter names. Do we?
Should be answered by the message I just sent...
> } > shift "i > $# ? $# : i" # Stupid shift error on i > $#
> }
> } Yes! It's annoying, isn't it? I was tempted more than one to change it.
>
> Bash gives the same error. Sigh.
So does ksh (`shift: bad number'). Damn. Does that make `argv=( $argv[2,-1] )'
more efficient in some cases? (Assignments are one of those things
that get optimised by the execution code, avoiding the call to
execpline*() and execcmd().)
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author