Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: CVS ?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 10201
- From: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: CVS ?
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:56:11 +0000
- In-reply-to: <1000322165019.ZM1475@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 04:50:19PM +0000
- Mail-followup-to: Zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20000322150928.A19079@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1000322165019.ZM1475@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Bart Schaefer (schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Mar 22, 3:09pm, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> } Subject: CVS ?
> }
> } Is there any progress on the Sourceforge front ? Or has anyone started
> } their own CVS repository ?
>
> I thought Adam was waiting for a reply on whether sourceforge was willing
> to host the sources under the zsh license. Adam?
Still waiting :-( I'll give them another gentle poke now ...
> } Will there be snapshots again ?
>
> PWS has indicated he'll be starting up again soon. I sent him a list of
> the patches since -dev-19 (up through article 10168) a couple days ago.
>
> I'm now generally of the opinion that we should go ahead with sourceforge
> if they're OK with the license; initialize it by grabbing Tanaka's CVSROOT
> with cvsup and worry about the mailing lists later (probably, much later).
Except that his cvsupd stopped running a while ago, I think. Not that
that's a problem; I'm probably not the only one with a mirror of it.
> However, having waited this long, we might as well wait for PWS to give
> his opinion.
Agreed. He is the coordinator after all :-)
Adam -- very much looking forward to getting the latest code again
(haven't even got the wordcode stuff yet ...)
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author