Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: 3.1.6-dev-22
- X-seq: zsh-workers 10599
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22
- Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:22:19 +0000
- In-reply-to: <E12eMqy-0005cC-00.2000-04-09-19-54-36@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <E12eMqy-0005cC-00.2000-04-09-19-54-36@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Apr 9, 7:54pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: 3.1.6-dev-22
}
} I have uploaded
} ftp://ftp.zsh.org/zsh/development/zsh-3.1.6-dev-22.tar.gz
} which is also tagged in the CVS archive as zsh-3_1_6-dev-22 .
} (At least, the message says it worked, although I can't see it there yet.)
About an hour later now, and it still isn't there yet.
} It's now time for anybody to suggest things which need doing (and which are
} likely actually to get done) before 3.1.7, else I shall start producing
} pre-releases.
I've sent a number of messages asking about potential changes, to which
there have been no replies or at least no decision (e.g., 10346, users/3013,
users/2973, others). Does Sven have any outstanding issues with completion?
} I would appreciate any opinions on whether fixing
} `export' to work locally in functions is a good idea. We can now do export
} -g to refer to the global variable --- but it's been the way it is for so
} long that maybe a change would cause trouble. It's not suitable to have an
} option for this.
I think it should work like ksh in sh/ksh emulation modes, but otherwise I
think the current behavior is OK. That isn't exactly the same as having an
option; do you believe that also to be unsuitable?
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author