Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: copy-prev-word question RE: Bug report interface comments
- X-seq: zsh-workers 10642
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: copy-prev-word question RE: Bug report interface comments
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:48:10 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Tue, 11 Apr 2000 02:52:09 +0000
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Apr 10, 9:58am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
> } Subject: Re: copy-prev-word question RE: Bug report interface comments
> }
> } And the maual was wrong, wasn't it?
> }
> } -Duplicate the word behind the cursor.
> } +Duplicate the word before the cursor.
>
> Behind in space, before in time. What is left behind has gone before,
> but what lies ahead is still before us, and the part after this is even
> more confusing after I've written it.
>
> This is what we English speakers get for muddling our temporal-spacial
> relationships: We're always getting ahead of ourselves, and no one else
> can tell whether we're coming or going.
>
> So "behind the cursor" is to the left of it (unless you're writing in
> Hebrew or Aramaic or something) and I think the doc was correct before,
> or rather it was correct "behind."
;-) Everything is crystal clear now...
Back to the original question: should I commit the patch? With a
to-the-left-of-the-cursor manual as suggested by Oliver? Should I make
it a separate widget? (Name? I can only think of copy-last-word which
is probably to easily confused with copy-prev-word and insert-last-word.)
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author