Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: 3.1.6-dev-22
- X-seq: zsh-workers 10703
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:57:14 +0000
- Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <E12fMjj-0001Op-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <E12fMjj-0001Op-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Apr 12, 1:59pm, Zefram wrote:
} Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22
}
} Bart Schaefer wrote:
} >> If you don't see a problem with changing the way zshpaths.h is made (and I
} >> presume you tried it out) then I certainly don't.
} >
} >Zefram? I believe it's your test I'm proposing to delete ... or maybe it's
} >Zoltan's ...
}
} It's really a policy decision: when should zshpaths.h be rebuilt.
} I've previously expressed my point of view on that -- that zshpaths.h
} should always be made consistent with the parameter values effective in
} the make in progress
That's a slightly different issue. I'm proposing to have zshpaths.h built
*more* often, not less ... the test I want to remove *prevents* zshpaths.h
from being rebuilt in some circumstances.
Here's the (not committed to SourceForge) diff for reference:
--- zsh-forge/common/Src/zsh.mdd Fri Jan 14 11:15:00 2000
+++ zsh-3.1.6/Src/zsh.mdd Sat Apr 8 16:12:55 2000
@@ -49,13 +49,8 @@
>>zshpaths.h.tmp; \
fi; \
fi
- @if cmp -s zshpaths.h zshpaths.h.tmp; then \
- rm -f zshpaths.h.tmp; \
- echo "\`zshpaths.h' is up to date." ; \
- else \
- mv -f zshpaths.h.tmp zshpaths.h; \
- echo "Updated \`zshpaths.h'." ; \
- fi
+ @mv -f zshpaths.h.tmp zshpaths.h; \
+ echo "Updated \`zshpaths.h'."
bltinmods.list: modules.stamp modules-bltin xmods.conf mkbltnmlst.sh
srcdir='$(sdir)' MODBINS='modules-bltin' \
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author