Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: List of unresolved issues
- X-seq: zsh-workers 10762
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: List of unresolved issues
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:57:41 +0000
- In-reply-to: <200004140818.KAA23909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <200004140818.KAA23909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Apr 14, 10:18am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
} Subject: Re: List of unresolved issues
}
} > } > 10187 combining multiple zstyle commands into one
} >
} > Actually, I now think the shell function implementation is fine.
}
} I don't understand why it uses case instead of if/else, though:
Easier to change later if any other options need special-casing. When
I started writing it I thought some might.
} The `zMULTstyle' and the missing `builtin's: I would be against naming
} it just `zstyle' for two reasons: 1) speed in the completion functions
} which don't need this shortcut syntax because it's only for defining
} styles
No problem. Name it something else, alias it back to zstyle, and make
sure the completion autoloads use -U.
} and 2) _complete_help needs to define a zstyle function itself
Too bad we can't declare `local functions[zstyle]'. Pretend I didn't
just suggest that.
} So, I haven't added/committed this because there probably is a better
} name than zmultstyle. Yes?
Is "zstyle+" bad because it would mean a file with a '+' in it's name?
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author