Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Test (re)numbering
- X-seq: zsh-workers 11343
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: Test (re)numbering
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 09:16:59 +0000
- In-reply-to: <0FUF00D90VFYFO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <0FUF00D90VFYFO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On May 12, 9:55am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: Test (re)numbering
}
} Bart wrote
} > I'd like to propose we renumber to the following numbering scheme:
}
} There's no world digit shortage; we could just use three-digit numbers
Yes, and we probably should for 4.0 when we also massivly rename in the
Completion subdirectories. I was aiming for minimal renaming for 3.1.7.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author