Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Test (re)numbering

X-seq: zsh-workers 11348
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
Subject: Re: Test (re)numbering
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 14:17:07 +0000
In-reply-to: <0FUF00DEXYURFO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <0FUF00DEXYURFO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On May 12, 11:08am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: Test (re)numbering
}
} Bart wrote
} > Yes, and we probably should for 4.0 when we also massivly rename in the
} > Completion subdirectories.  I was aiming for minimal renaming for 3.1.7.
} 
} Renaming twice strikes me as extra horrible from the CVS point of view.

I was also operating under the assumption that we were going to start a
fresh repository for 4.0, so that the number of renamings is moot from
a CVS point of view.

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

References:
- Re: Test (re)numbering
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author