Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Completion tests fail with patches to 11415
- X-seq: zsh-workers 11430
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Completion tests fail with patches to 11415
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 08:52:23 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Tue, 16 May 2000 16:38:25 +0000
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> *** /tmp/zsh.ztst.out.26678 Tue May 16 09:36:31 2000
> --- /tmp/zsh.ztst.tout.26678 Tue May 16 09:36:33 2000
> ***************
> *** 1 ****
> ! line: {tst -x }{}
> --- 1,2 ----
> ! line: {tst -}{}
> ! MESSAGE:{arg}
> Test ../../zsh-3.1.6/Test/53completion.ztst failed: output differs from expected as shown above for:
> code='compdef _tst tst; _tst () { _arguments "-x" ":arg:" }'
> comptest -c "$code" $'tst -\t'
> Was testing: _arguments
> ../../zsh-3.1.6/Test/53completion.ztst: test failed.
That's caused by 11406. Humm.
What are we supposed to do now. With respect to the patch, this
behaviour is correct (and quite reasonable, I think). Should we only
update the test? Should we make _arguments not try default-option
completion only when it tried a *non-empty* action?
I think I prefer the former.
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author