Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: Re: _rpm odd behavior
- X-seq: zsh-workers 11584
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: _rpm odd behavior
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 16:02:06 +0000
- In-reply-to: <200005240829.KAA23193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <200005240829.KAA23193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On May 24, 10:29am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
} Subject: PATCH: Re: _rpm odd behavior
}
} [The patch] also adds the `-c'. Any other missing options anywhere?
Depends on the version of rpm. `-c' may not be valid in the 2.x versions
of rpm; there are some more that are valid in 3.x. I don't think we have
a coherent scheme for dealing with revisions of the same command, do we?
Mostly we just complete for the newest one we know about.
I may take a look at _rpm later if no one else gets there first. But it
may be tomorrow, so if someone else has time, don't wait for me.
We could try to parse the output of "rpm --help"; but it's heirarchical,
representing the modes selected by one of -q -e -U -b -t, so we'd still
need to assist it a bit. I probably *won't* attempt that.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author