RE: More make check failure

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andrej Borsenkow wrote:

> ...
> 
> I am not sure, what should I get:
> 
> bor@itsrm2% zsh -f
> itsrm2% autoload compinit; compinit -D
> itsrm2% {
> cursh>   compdef foo foo
> cursh>   foo() {
> cursh function>     compadd -M 'm:{a-zA-Z}={A-Za-z}
> cursh function quote>                 r:|[.,_-]=*
> r:[^A-Z0-9]||[A-Z0-9]=*
> cursh function quote>                 r:[A-Z0-9]||[^A-Z0-9]=*
> cursh function quote>                 r:[^0-9]||[0-9]=* r:|=*' \
> cursh function>         build.out build.out1 build.out2
> cursh function>   }
> cursh> }
> itsrm2% foo build.out<CURSOR HERE>
> build.out    build.out1   build.out2

You should get exactly that. In the test the cursor was placed after
the `build'.

Damn. I'm still pretty sure this has to do with some uninitialised
memory. But where?

But this should probably not keep us from releasing 3.1.7. If we don't 
want users to see this we could comment the test out. I'll keep it on
my list, although I fear I will never be able to reproduce it.

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx