Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Cygwin path completion
- X-seq: zsh-workers 11946
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: Cygwin path completion
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:47:07 +0100
- In-reply-to: "Your message of Fri, 16 Jun 2000 17:27:41 +0400." <000701bfd796$a61a7040$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Andrej wrote:
> Even if
> we cannot find out all drives (is it possible?) _path_files still has to
> treat /cygdrive/?/ specially, and not try to glob it. It can also always
> offer ``cygdrive'' for the first component (of course, if it matches
> current prefix/suffix).
Sven will have to answer for the feasibility of all of this, but...
One thing that might fit our needs here and elsewhere (e.g. speedups of
path completion when you know you don't want initial path components
re-jigged) is a style along the lines of fix-path-prefix, only maybe with a
better name. A number would fix that many components (`2', here), while
something else e.g. `all' would turn off completion of earlier bits of the
path altogether. A more generic `fix-prefix' might possibly be useful in
certain other completions.
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cambridge Silicon Radio, Unit 300, Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0XL, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author