Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Is complist really optional?

X-seq: zsh-workers 12159
From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is complist really optional?
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 14:52:46 +0200 (MET DST)
In-reply-to: "Andrej Borsenkow"'s message of Tue, 4 Jul 2000 11:32:10 +0400
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

Andrej Borsenkow wrote:

> I wonder, should not we load complist by default? It started as
> experimental once, but now almost all bells and whistles of new
> completion interface is based on it.

I don't care much, but saying that `almost all...' are based on
complist is a bit much, don't you think?

> Or simply merge complist with the
> rest of completion code.

Do you mean to put it into the complete module? I /think/ there would
be people against it...

And currently it *is* quite cleanly separated. One can do without
complist, one can use it with new and with old completion...

Bye
 Sven

--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author