Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: adding a toplevel zsh.spec.in file
- X-seq: zsh-workers 12196
- From: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>
- To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: adding a toplevel zsh.spec.in file
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 18:44:06 +0100 (BST)
- Cc: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>, zsh workers mailing list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1000707171820.ZM1423@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Bart Schaefer at "Jul 7, 2000 05:18:20 pm"
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Bart Schaefer wrote:
>If we're going to add, or replace it with, stuff that IS intended to go
>in /etc/z*, there should be some kind of README or other explanatory file
>added as well.
Is there anything that ought to go in /etc/z* on more machines than,
say, those in a single company? It seems to me that Red Hat and
other Linux distributions should be shipping with no (or empty)
/etc/{profile,z{sh{env,rc},profile,login},csh.*} files. We *should*
add a README explaining how the existing example files are meant to
be used, and explaining why it's usually a bad idea to put anything in
global shell startup files.
-zefram
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author