Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: _killall on linux
- X-seq: zsh-workers 12207
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: _killall on linux
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:13:55 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Sat, 8 Jul 2000 17:02:05 +0000
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Jul 8, 4:49pm, Thomas Köhler wrote:
> } Subject: _killall on linux
> }
> } Now, the problem is: _killall won't complete all process names. This is
> } not a big deal for "normal" users, but root may have to kill other
> } user's processes, too. May I suggest something like this (completing
> } _all_ process names for super users)
>
> We could put something like that [*] in, but you should note that this
> can already be configured via a style in root's .zshrc:
>
> zstyle ':completion:*:processes-names' command ps xa ho comm
>
> Making that configurable is the reason for the $(_call ...) expression.
>
> It's a bit weird that it's "processes-names" rather than "process-names".
> (Was there some reason for that? It's not completing both processes and
> names, and one doesn't normally use the possessive "processes' names" to
> refer to "names of processes".)
It doesn't have anything to do with real english -- it's just the tag
used with some strings appended, to make it easier to remember them.
At least I thought it would be easier...
> [*] Rather than $( [[ "$UID" = 0 ]] && print -n xa ) I'd suggest the less
> resource-intensive ${=EUID//(#s)0(#e)/ps xa}.
I wouldn't be agains that patch. But I think it raises the question if
we should add other default for some systems, such as -u$USER.
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author