Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Bug in ${(z)...} lexing, or what?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 12236
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: Bug in ${(z)...} lexing, or what?
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:41:20 +0000
- In-reply-to: <0FXL002CJGG9E2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <0FXL002CJGG9E2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jul 12, 5:57pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: Bug in ${(z)...} lexing, or what?
}
} That was before applying the patch (the correct behaviour). After, I get:
}
} [[
} a
} =
} (
} ;
}
} with interactivecomments set (which is wrong), and what Sven was reporting
} without it (which isn't great). I'd much prefer the old behaviour in this
} case, but the interactivecomments variant is definitely broken.
The situation is exactly reversed inside a ZLE widget: The behavior with
both interactivecomments and without is now correct inside the widget, but
broken outside.
So was all Sven's patch acheived to invert some condition?
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author