Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: CVS per-patch flat tags still needed?

X-seq: zsh-workers 12269
From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
Subject: Re: CVS per-patch flat tags still needed?
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:52:22 +0100
In-reply-to: "Your message of Sun, 16 Jul 2000 18:22:06 PDT." <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007161814370.23825-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

> Do we need all the old per-patch flat tags that the pre-sourceforge
> CVS patch-applicator used to generate?  I've heard that having a lot
> of unused flat tags slows CVS down (presumably when using a tag name),
> and since we don't maintain any per-patch tags anymore, it seems to me
> that it would be a good idea to just remove them.  I'd be glad to do
> this, if we agree that this is a desired course of action (at least,
> once zsh.sourceforge.net comes back up again).

That would be a good idea.  I think we can get a long OK with the version
tags, the ChangeLog and the mailing list archive.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cambridge Silicon Radio, Unit 300, Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0XL, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CVS per-patch flat tags still needed?
  - From: Wayne Davison

References:
- CVS per-patch flat tags still needed?
  - From: Wayne Davison

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author