Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH (?): Re: wait for non-child PID

X-seq: zsh-workers 12413
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PATCH (?): Re: wait for non-child PID
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:22:03 +0000
In-reply-to: <1000727065708.ZM26483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <hvoaef56z0x.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20000726190953.A22895@xxxxxxxxxxx> <hvolmyoqhol.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1000727065708.ZM26483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jul 27,  6:57am, Bart Schaefer wrote:
}
} Short of doing that, the only thing to do seems to be to rely on the job
} table.  I won't commit the following patch until we're reasonably sure
} that there are no interesting cases of child processes that can't be
} detected by findproc() -- something I'm not entirely certain of myself.

Anybody have anything to say about this?  If nobody knows the answer, then
maybe instead I should commit it and we can watch for things that break.

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net

References:
- wait for non-child PID
  - From: Tanaka Akira
- Re: wait for non-child PID
  - From: Clint Adams
- Re: wait for non-child PID
  - From: Tanaka Akira
- PATCH (?): Re: wait for non-child PID
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author