Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Bug or feature?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 12424
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: Bug or feature?
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:09:35 +0000
- Cc: Juhapekka Tolvanen <juhtolv@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <0FYE002AZR70PO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007281533350.23804-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <0FYE002AZR70PO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007281533350.23804-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jul 28, 1:40pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} > > ii zsh 3.1.6.pws21-1 A shell with lots of features.
} >
} > That's pretty old. Could you install at least 3.1.9? In any case, I
} > presume it was a bug, since it works in current version.
}
} I don't know if it's that simple, but I don't know if it isn't either.
} We've got an old 3.1.6-dev-19 here and it works there, too. But there was
} no such version as 3.1.6.pws21 since I'd switched to using dev by then.
We could find out for sure if Juhapekka would run `echo $ZSH_VERSION'. The
Debian package number is only of interest in figuring out if they made a
change that broke something.
On Jul 28, 3:51pm, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
}
} Well, Potato is frozen state right now and it will go to stable state very
} soon. No single package in stable Debian distribution is allowed to have so
} called release critical bugs. And that means, that zsh provided with Potato
} has no release critical bugs.
It means no package in Potato has a release-critical bug that the Debian
team knows about. Not quite the same thing.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author