Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Bug or feature?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 12428
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Juhapekka Tolvanen <juhtolv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Bug or feature?
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:10:40 +0000
- Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007281914490.27999-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007281914490.27999-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jul 28, 7:30pm, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
}
} % zsh --version
Hmm, I'm a little surprised that zsh silently ignored that. I believe
it's treating it the same as `--' (end of options). Zsh is not a GNU
package and doesn't understand any "long options".
} http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/user/guckes/version/
Sven's a good guy, but I think he's misguided in this case. (It also
hadn't stopped him from being a zsh user, last time I talked to him.)
Furthermore, zsh attempts to give a reasonable impersonation of a number
of older standard shells, none of which would do what Sven wants when
given --version as an argument.
I also note:
zagzig[265] bash --version
bash: --: bad option
Given that `--' is a perfectly good option on its own, it's pretty clear
that bash is treating `--version' as `-' followed by eight individual
single-letter options.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author