Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: Document REPLY/reply, misc. other parameter indexing
- X-seq: zsh-workers 12718
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Document REPLY/reply, misc. other parameter indexing
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:31:46 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Tue, 29 Aug 2000 06:22:10 +0000
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> ...
>
> I wish I could figure out when the docs are intended to use `tt(foo)' and
> when just tt(foo) without the ticks. (The difficulty is that in info the
> typewriter face is lost and you can't see the emphasis without the `...'.)
> I chose to make nearby paragraphs consistent with each other, even if things
> aren't consistent across more widely separated uses.
There's a bit about it in the Etc/zsh-development-guide. But in some
cases... (I think Peter and I were changing things back and forth in
the completion system documentation some time ago). For example, the
documentation of the ignore-parents style. Sometimes tt(../),
sometimes `tt(../)'. It may even be consistent, but doesn't look good,
I think.
So, if you want to change the standard... ;-)
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author