Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

RE: paths vs files tags

X-seq: zsh-workers 13020
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: paths vs files tags
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:26:12 +0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200010180714.JAA10770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

> 
> 
> Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
> 
> > Both are tested in _path_files only and both are used to 
> configure _path_files
> > behaviour. Are they not redundant?
> 
> I've been wondering about this, too.  Initially I did that to
> distinguish between styles that affect single components and those
> that affect whole paths. But maybe we could reasonably change it.
> 
> And then use `files' or `paths'?
> 

paths is more close to the semantic, but files is easier to pronounce :-)

I vote for paths. 

-andrej

References:
- Re: paths vs files tags
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author