Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: bug with completion (after 15 oct?)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 13078
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: bug with completion (after 15 oct?)
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:14:51 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: mason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx's message of 24 Oct 2000 14:33:47 GMT
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Geoff Wing wrote:
> Heyla,
> am currently investigating a bug with completion which manifested in the
> last week or so:
>
> % zsh.new -f
> % cd /tmp; mkdir foo; cd foo; touch bar baz
> % ls ba<TAB> # <TAB><RETURN> or CTRL-U or whatever
> bar baz
> % ls ba<TAB> # OK
> % exit
> % zsh.new
> % cd /tmp
> % ls ba<TAB> # <TAB><RETURN> or CTRL-U or whatever
> --> completing file
> bar baz
> % ls ba<TAB>
> zsh: 20301 segmentation fault (core dumped) zsh.new
>
> A backtrace gives the following - maybe it's useful to someone - but I'll
> try to narrow it down to a set of initialisation options.
> Hmm, what's worse is that a version compiled --disable-dynamic sometimes
> gives a segv a bit later (line 1034).
Sigh. Of course I couldn't reproduce that.
> 0x80af60b in compprintlist (showall=0) at complist.c:1023
> 1023 char **pp = g->ylist;
> (gdb) p *lastg
> $1 = {name = 0x0, prev = 0x0, next = 0x2, flags = 135607944, mcount = 2,
> matches = 0x0, lcount = 0, llcount = 1, ylist = 0x8157fc8, ecount = 0,
> expls = 0x0, ccount = 0, lexpls = 0x0, lmatches = 0x0, lfmatches = 0x1,
> lallccs = 0x0, num = 0, nbrbeg = 0, nbrend = 2, new = 2, dcount = 1,
> cols = 6, lins = 0, width = 12, widths = 0x6, totl = 0, shortest = 80,
> perm = 0x0}
Does that mean that amatches is garbled at that point?
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author