Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: Re: :r modifier

X-seq: zsh-workers 13477
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: :r modifier
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:44:57 -0800
In-reply-to: <Tc0a8890c51baadb268@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <Tc0a8890c51baadb268@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Feb 14,  6:40pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: :r modifier
> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> > I'd hate to beat a dead horse, but it's not clear to me 
> > whether 13280 has been rejected or just forgotten.
> 
> That's because it's not clear to anyone. I don't have any objections,
> does anyone know if they are relying on the old (somewhat unexpected)
> behaviour?

I don't believe I'm relying on the old behavior; I have a certain sort
of nostalgia for it because that's how the original csh behaves, but I
suppose we're long beyond worrying about compatibility with *that*.

References:
- Re: PATCH: Re: :r modifier
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author