Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: Re: 4.0.1-pre-1
- X-seq: zsh-workers 13579
- From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz <duret_g@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: 4.0.1-pre-1
- Date: 06 Mar 2001 17:07:22 +0100
- In-reply-to: <200103061257.NAA02830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Organization: LRDE/EPITA http://www.lrde.epita.fr/
- References: <200103061257.NAA02830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: Alexandre Duret-Lutz <adl@xxxxxxxx>
>>> "Sven" == Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
Sven> Yes, lots ;-)
As always :)
[...]
Sven> The patch makes that testsuite work, roughly consuming as much memory
Sven> as bash on this machine here (both sh and ksh use less memory, sigh).
Here zsh now consumes less memory that bash, and the testsuite
is really usable, that's great! However it is still
significantly slower:
% time bash testsuite > /dev/null
bash testsuite > /dev/null 0.88s user 0.44s system 101% cpu 1.302 total
% time zsh testsuite > /dev/null
zsh testsuite > /dev/null 7.13s user 0.27s system 100% cpu 7.357 total
(this is a testsuite that exists before the first test, as I explained.)
I don't really care myself, 7s doesn't sound too much for such a
big script, but maybe you'll have another great idea... This
testsuite seems like a good benchmark for the parsing code.
[...]
Thanks!
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author