Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: _mh; handling of mail etc. completion
- X-seq: zsh-workers 13681
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: PATCH: _mh; handling of mail etc. completion
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:04:47 +0000
- In-reply-to: <Tc0a88d01526862591d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <Tc0a88d01526862591d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mar 20, 12:11pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: PATCH: _mh; handling of mail etc. completion
}
} - There are no completions for standard mail programmes or common
} tools like elm and pine.
You'll note that _mailboxes can handle several such programs, though.
We just don't have a file containing the #compdef line to hook it up.
Of course there's more we *could* do ... even _mutt could, for example,
grovel alias names out of the apprpriate config file to complete in the
userhost state when there's no @ in the word yet.
} - There is no special handling user@domain instead of user@host. This
} can be done with contexts, but maybe it would be nicer to have some
} special mail _user_at_host handling which allows pws@xxxxxxx (where
} csr.com doesn't appear in my normal hosts list for obvious reasons).
Hmm. Is there anything else about the handling of domains that would be
distinct from hosts?
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author